Updated 9 October 2019
Stirling B
|
|
v
|
|
Stirling C
|
Brad Duthie
David McAlister
Dave Hewitt
John Blake
Richard Warcup
|
1494
1567
1547
1531
1463 |
½ - ½
0 - 1
1 - 0
1 - 0
1 - 0 |
1425
1398
1389
1413
1284 |
Martyn Roe
Aaron Nobile
Tom Wallace
Tony Pitson
Gordon Allcock |
|
|
3½ - 1½ |
|
|
Dave Hewitt has annotated his game, describing it as "the first really lively one I've had for a while, after a series of quiet encounters."
Games
[Event "Central League Division 2"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2019.10.07"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Wallace, Tom "]
[Black "Hewitt, Dave"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C00"]
[Annotator "Hewitt"]
[PlyCount "44"]
[EventDate "2019.10.07"]
[SourceVersionDate "2019.10.08"]
{[%evp 0,44,16,28,55,-4,-9,-6,-6,-49,-49,-86,-40,-57,-47,-119,-81,-54,-17,-10,
21,-23,-38,-49,-34,-63,-31,-45,-53,-71,-47,-276,-198,-198,0,-1652,-1706,-2169,
-2209,-2375,-2876,-2491,-29990,-29991,-29992,-29995,-2290]} {My game against
Tom was an interesting scrap which, as often in suddenly unstable positions,
included a defensive resource (for White) which we both missed and which would
potentially have led to equality. The first crucial point came at move 15.
Before that it was pretty quiet - Tom got behind in development but I didn't
manage to take the initiative.} 1. e4 e6 2. b3 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. d4 Nf6 5. h3
Be7 6. Nf3 O-O 7. c4 Re8 {This was a rudimentary trap, as something such as 8
Bb2 allows 8 ...Bb4#, not that Tom was ever going to fall for that (and I felt
slightly bad/rude about setting it up at the time, as 8 ...c5 would have been
better long-term).} 8. Be2 c6 9. O-O Nbd7 10. Re1 Ne4 11. a3 Ndf6 12. Bd3 Bf5
13. c5 h6 14. Bf4 Nh5 15. Bxh6 {I'd expected 15 Bh2 (which, like Be3 or Be5,
gives White a slight edge according to the computer), but after quite a long
think Tom opted to liven things up with 15 Bxh6. This doesn't work, and the
machine reckons I should just have taken the piece, but I'd been eyeing-up an
f2 sac of my own and now, with the dark-squared Bishop having gone elsewhere,
it proved too tempting to resist, hence} Nxf2 16. Kxf2 ({Tom had to take this
- if the Queen moves, eg} 16. Qd2 {then} Nxd3 {wins without much fuss but
there now came the second key moment.}) 16... Bh4+ {Instead of this check, I
should have taken one of the pieces - 16 ...Bxd3 or ...gxh6, with a solid
advantage. However, 16 ...Bh4+ looked obvious and I played it without much
analysis.} 17. Nxh4 {After this capture it's just lost - once the Queen comes
in with check it's too strong and everything collapses quickly, as the Bd3
drops with check and can't be recaptured because of 19 ...Rxe1#.} ({But after
16 ...Bh4+, Tom had scope to play the calm} 17. Kg1 {the point being that after
} Bxe1 {White has} 18. Bg5 {and then after} f6 {the loose Bf5 (which I'd been
worried about throughout the combination) drops, viz.} 19. Bxf5 fxg5 20. Nxe1 {
and White is OK. Complicated stuff, but instructive given that there's so
often a moment like this within an attack when the defender can fend things
off.}) 17... Qxh4+ 18. Kf1 Bxd3+ 19. Re2 Bxe2+ 20. Qxe2 Ng3+ 21. Kg1 Nxe2+ 22.
Kh2 Qxh6 {White resigned.} ({At the end - which is horrible for White, as
suddenly all of black's pieces are on the right squares - I thought I'd missed
a mate, not that it mattered by then, and indeed I had} 22... Qg3+ 23. Kh1 Qe1+
24. Kh2 Qg1#) 0-1